The reason for this page
Ensigma supports Open Source but we realise it is not a panacea and it does not represent to best solution for all problems. However,
it's relevence it the world is growing, and, based on our own experiences we believe it is an option that should be considered in many
situations.
Whilst the awareness of Open Source software and its benefits is growing many people are still skeptical when they are told that a
free product may be as good as, or better than, an expensive proprietory product.
Often clients ask us about the benefits of Open source, or people new to the Open Source community ask us for information. Hence,
we decided to compile some resources for you to peruse and form your own opinion.
General Information
Licenses
Here's a great comparison of the Microsoft End-User License Agreement and the GPL license which is used for most Linux code. Below is an interesting snippet from the article relating to legal rights:
It is one of the more generally repeated presumptions of users who select to purchase and operate
Microsoft's applications released under the EULA (over corresponding Open Source applications
released under the GPL,) that they do so because they have someone to hold legally responsible in
case of application software failure or catastrophic error. A close reading of the EULA reveals that
the licence explicitly removes all avenues and all recourse that a user of Microsoft's software has for
legal relief of any sort. At best, you may recover the cost of the software product, or US$5.
Further,Microsoft's software has ever successfully litigated against Microsoft with respect to application
software failure or catastrophic error, in the 27 years of their operation. If you are aware of any such
instance, we would welcome full details.
Can Open Source Out-Perform Commercial Products
Apache is a perfect example of a "Best of Breed" tool which is Open Source. It is the
most used web server in the world and there are good reasons why....
"With the emergence of the Nimda worm--the latest in a long series to attack Microsoft's Internet Information Server (IIS)
and other software--Gartner believes it's time for businesses with Web applications to start investigating less vulnerable
Web server products."
Find the whole story
here or another good article
about the same Gartner recommendation
here
The "Total Cost of Ownership" debate
- Here's a good article on TCO
- Or for a more quantitative look try here
Security
Here is a link to the Security chapter to David Wheeler's paper
on Open Source (which is also referenced above)
Specific Issues with IE
WikiPedia has a very good article on some of the issues that exist with IE and a discussion of the ramifications of these. The article can be found
Here
Some things Microsoft might not (or at least should not) be proud of
Are Microsoft as lily-white as they would have us believe....
- Their apparently deliberate sabotage of pages loaded from MSN in the
Opera browser seems a little nasty. Read this and form your own opinion.
I personally experienced this problem and so I know the key contentions of this article are true (and, as far as I know,
this is undesputed by Microsoft,... but then, I guess it's hard to dispute demonstrable facts, without looking silly)
Can Microsoft Convince us Otherwise??
Microsoft have some information of their website which show favourable comparisons where MS products have out-performed their Linux
counterparts. It can be found at
http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/facts/default.asp. The quoted figures are almost compelling, the articles themselves are far
less so. I don't think many people dispute that there are scenarios in which Windows comes out on top - surprisingly even Microsoft
seems to struggle to isolate these cases.